Laws Concerning Women in 17th-Century New Jersey
In the 17th century, the area now known as New Jersey was under both Dutch and English rule. Originally part of the Dutch colony of New Netherland, it was ceded to the English in 1664, becoming the Province of New Jersey. This dual colonial heritage resulted in a distinctive legal framework that impacted women’s rights, property, and social conduct. Women in 17th-century New Jersey navigated laws that reflected both Dutch legal traditions, which were relatively progressive for women, and English common law, which had a more patriarchal focus. These legal systems influenced women’s ability to own property, marry, conduct business, and behave in accordance with societal expectations.
Women and Property Rights
Under Dutch rule, New Jersey was part of New Netherland, where the legal system was relatively progressive regarding women's property rights. In Dutch law, women had considerable rights to own, inherit, and manage property, especially if they were widows or unmarried. Widows in New Netherland retained control over their deceased husbands' estates, a provision that allowed them to continue managing the family’s wealth and business activities. This was a significant departure from English common law, which generally placed property under the control of a woman's husband once she married, a legal arrangement known as coverture.
When the English took control of New Jersey in 1664, the legal framework shifted towards English common law, which restricted women's rights to property. The principle of coverture meant that once a woman married, her legal identity was subsumed under her husband's, and any property she brought into the marriage was controlled by him. This shift placed significant limits on married women’s ability to own or control property independently. However, widows retained certain rights, such as dower rights, entitling them to a portion of their deceased husband’s estate (usually one-third). Despite this, women in New Jersey were often dependent on male relatives to inherit or manage property.
Women and Business Ownership
Under Dutch law, women had more opportunities to engage in business and commerce compared to many other English colonies. In New Netherland, some women owned businesses, including inns, shops, and farms, and were able to engage in legal contracts. This allowed for a degree of economic independence that was rare for women in many other regions. Widows, in particular, were empowered by Dutch law to inherit and manage their husbands’ businesses, ensuring their continued participation in the local economy.
However, the shift to English rule in 1664 altered the landscape of business ownership for women in New Jersey. While unmarried women and widows still had the legal right to own and manage businesses, married women were largely restricted from engaging in independent business activities. The English doctrine of coverture meant that any business activities of a married woman were considered to be conducted under the authority of her husband. Thus, while women could still inherit businesses and property as widows or single women, their ability to engage in business independently was severely limited once married.
Laws Governing Women’s Behavior
Dutch rule in New Netherland was characterized by a degree of religious tolerance and social flexibility, which allowed for less strict enforcement of moral behavior laws compared to English colonies. Women were expected to adhere to the basic norms of modesty and piety, but there was some freedom in personal religious practices and social conduct. However, Dutch colonial authorities did regulate social behavior, and women were expected to maintain respectable reputations in the community. Women found guilty of adultery or immoral behavior faced public shaming or fines, but punishments were typically less severe compared to the English colonial systems.
The imposition of English rule brought stricter moral codes to New Jersey. Under English law, particularly influenced by Puritan and Anglican beliefs, women’s sexual behavior and overall moral conduct were closely regulated. Adultery, fornication, and other moral transgressions were treated as serious offenses, with severe punishments for women found guilty. Adultery was often punishable by public shaming, fines, or corporal punishment, and women were more likely to face harsher penalties than men for similar offenses. These laws reinforced the social idea that women were the moral gatekeepers of the family, and their behavior reflected directly on their husbands, families, and communities.
Specific Laws and Social Norms
The laws governing women in 17th-century New Jersey were heavily shaped by the dual influences of Dutch and English colonial rule. The legal treatment of women in matters of property, marriage, and behavior can be illustrated by several key laws and practices:
Adultery Law: Under English rule, adultery was considered a serious offense, and women found guilty could face public humiliation, fines, or even corporal punishment. Although both men and women were technically subject to punishment for adultery, women were more likely to face harsher social consequences. Public punishment for women found guilty of adultery was often aimed at reinforcing social order and emphasizing the importance of marital fidelity.
Fornication Law: Unmarried women who had sexual relations outside of marriage were also severely punished in New Jersey. Women found guilty of fornication faced public punishment, including whipping or fines. These laws reflected the intense social pressures placed on women to maintain their sexual purity, and the penalties for violating these norms were often more severe for women than for men.
Witchcraft and Slander Laws: As in many other colonies, accusations of witchcraft and slander disproportionately affected women in New Jersey. Women who were seen as nonconformists or who violated social expectations were at risk of being accused of witchcraft. While witchcraft accusations were not as widespread in New Jersey as they were in New England, women still faced the threat of persecution based on societal fears. Slander laws also targeted women, especially those who were perceived as challenging male authority or who were involved in gossip or scandal.
Gender Inequalities in Legal and Social Consequences
The shift from Dutch to English rule in New Jersey marked a significant change in the legal status of women. While Dutch law had allowed women more autonomy in property ownership, business, and social behavior, English law, particularly coverture, placed more limitations on women’s independence. The transition to English rule reinforced patriarchal structures that subordinated women and placed them under the control of their husbands or male relatives.
Women’s behavior was more heavily scrutinized under English law, particularly when it came to issues of sexual morality. Women who violated the expectations of chastity or marital fidelity faced harsh punishments, reflecting the broader societal belief that women were responsible for maintaining family and community honor. These legal structures further entrenched gender inequalities, as women’s legal rights and autonomy were often subordinated to the authority of men.
Despite these legal constraints, women in 17th-century New Jersey found ways to assert their rights and influence their communities. Widows, in particular, were able to navigate the legal system to maintain control over their property and businesses. Women also played important roles in the religious and social life of the colony, often exercising their influence within their families and local communities. However, the broader legal and social systems placed significant limits on women’s ability to achieve full independence.
Bibliography
Books
Baker, Robert H. Colonial New Jersey: A History. University of New York Press, 2005.
Brown, Kathleen M. Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, and Anxious Patriarchs: Gender, Race, and Power in Colonial Virginia. University of North Carolina Press, 2008.
Dayton, Cornelia Hughes. Women before the Bar: Gender, Law, and Society in Connecticut, 1639-1789. University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
Foster, Lawrence. The Colonial Women of New York. University of New York Press, 2002.
Haskins, Catherine, ed. Women and the Law in Early America: The Impact of Gender on Colonial Legal Culture. Routledge, 2016.
Karlsen, Carol F. The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England. W.W. Norton & Company, 1987.
Reis, Elizabeth. Damned Women: Sinners and Witches in Puritan New England. Cornell University Press, 1997.
Ulrich, Laurel Thatcher. Good Wives: Image and Reality in the Lives of Women in Northern New England, 1650-1750. Alfred A. Knopf, 1982.
Cohen, Julie A. The Reconstruction of Women: Gender and Law in the Age of Revolution. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020.
Perry, Vanessa. "A Lady of Good Character": Gender, Race, and Reputation in Early American Women’s History. Harvard University Press, 2016.
Wolfe, Linda M. Women and Property in Early New Jersey: A Study in Legal and Social History. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.
Articles
Godbeer, Richard. "Sex and Gender in Colonial New England." Journal of American History, 2002. This article examines how gender expectations in colonial New England, including the control of women’s sexuality and autonomy, were enforced through legal and social structures.
Dayton, Cornelia Hughes. "Taking the Trade: Abortion and Gender Relations in an Eighteenth-Century New England Village." William and Mary Quarterly, 1991. Dayton explores the regulation of women’s reproductive choices and how this shaped gender dynamics in early colonial New England.
Bremer, Francis J. "Puritan Law and the Enforcement of Moral Behavior in Early New England." New England Quarterly, 1985. Bremer analyzes how Puritan moral codes were enforced through legal systems, particularly targeting women’s perceived moral failings.
Kamensky, Jane. "Governing the Tongue: Gossip, Slander, and Speech in Early New England." American Quarterly, 1999. Kamensky explores how women’s speech was controlled through laws against gossip and slander, which disproportionately impacted women in colonial society.
Plane, Ann Marie. "Indian Women and English Law in Colonial New York." Journal of American History, 1998. Plane investigates the intersection of English law and Native women’s rights in colonial New York, shedding light on both gender and racial dynamics.
Reis, Elizabeth. "Puritan Beliefs about Women and Sin." Colonial History Quarterly, 1997. Reis discusses how Puritan theology shaped laws and societal expectations about women, particularly in terms of their moral and spiritual vulnerability.
Breen, T.H. "The Socialization of the Early American Woman: Gender and Law in Colonial Virginia." Early American Literature, 2006. Breen explores how the legal system in colonial Virginia governed women’s roles and how laws mirrored social expectations of female behavior.
Smith, Kimberly. "Women and the Law in Early America: The Role of Marriage and Property in Colonial Legal Systems." Law and History Review, 2011. Smith examines the intersection of marriage laws and property rights and how these shaped the legal status of women in early America.
Baker, Thomas. "Gender and Legal Boundaries: Women’s Rights in Early New Jersey." New Jersey Historical Review, 2014. Baker explores the legal boundaries that defined women’s rights in early New Jersey, particularly focusing on property and inheritance laws.
