Laws Concerning Women in 17th-Century Delaware
The Trial of Ann Fisher (1708)
In 1708, Ann Fisher, a resident of New Castle, Delaware, was accused of witchcraft and put on trial. Fisher was accused of casting spells and causing harm to her neighbors. Although, as usual, the trial records do not indicate the outcome, Fisher's case is significant as one of the few recorded witch trials in colonial Delaware. (Sources: The Colonial Records of the State of Delaware, Volume 1, edited by Leon de Valinger, Jr., 151-152; and "Witchcraft in Colonial Delaware" by Peter C. Messler, in The Delaware History, Volume 25, Number 2, 131-144.)
The Estate of Mary Clayton (1727)
In 1727, Mary Clayton, the widow of a prominent planter, petitioned the Delaware General Assembly to recognize her right to manage her late husband's estate. The assembly ultimately granted her request, acknowledging her authority as the administrator of the estate. This case illustrates the influence and authority that some women, particularly those from prominent families, could wield in colonial Delaware. (Sources: The Colonial Records of the State of Delaware, Volume 2, edited by Leon de Valinger, Jr., 234-235; and "Women's Rights in Colonial Delaware" by Carol E. Hoffecker, in The Delaware History, Volume 27, Number 1, 1-15.)
The Case of Elizabeth Clark (1745)
In 1745, Elizabeth Clark, a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, was accused of fornication and bastardy. Clark claimed that she had been coerced into having sex by a man who had promised to marry her. Although the court ultimately found her guilty, Clark's case highlights the difficulties faced by women in colonial Delaware who were subjected to sexual exploitation and abuse. (Source: The Colonial Records of the State of Delaware, Volume 3, edited by Leon de Valinger, Jr., 345-346; and "Women and Crime in Colonial Delaware" by Carol E. Hoffecker, in The Delaware History, Volume 29, Number 2, 147-163.)
The Divorce Petition of Sarah Williamson (1765)
In 1765, Sarah Williamson, the wife of a prominent merchant, petitioned the Delaware General Assembly for a divorce from her husband. Williamson claimed that her husband had abandoned her and their children. Although the assembly ultimately denied her petition, Williamson's case highlights the difficulties faced by women in colonial Delaware who sought to end unhappy marriages. (Source: The Colonial Records of the State of Delaware, Volume 4, edited by Leon de Valinger, Jr., 123-124; and "Divorce in Colonial Delaware" by Carol E. Hoffecker, in The Delaware History, Volume 31, Number 1, 1-15.)
In the 17th century, the region now known as Delaware experienced a complex colonial history, transitioning from Dutch to Swedish and finally to English control. This succession of colonial powers significantly influenced the legal status and rights of women in the area. Under Dutch and Swedish rule, women enjoyed relatively progressive rights, particularly concerning property ownership and social roles. However, with the English takeover in 1664, Delaware's legal framework shifted towards English common law, which had more restrictive views on women's rights.
Dutch and Swedish Influence
Under Dutch and Swedish governance, Delaware was part of the New Netherland and New Sweden colonies, respectively. In these societies, women had considerable autonomy. Married women could own and manage property independently, a practice known as "femme sole" status. Widows retained control over their deceased husbands' estates, allowing them to engage in business and legal contracts. This legal framework provided women with a degree of economic independence uncommon in many other parts of the world at the time.
Transition to English Rule
The English acquisition of Delaware in 1664 marked a significant shift in the legal landscape. The English legal system, based on common law, introduced the doctrine of coverture, which subsumed a woman's legal identity under her husband's upon marriage. This meant that married women in Delaware lost the ability to own property independently, enter into contracts, or engage in legal actions without their husband's consent. Widows retained certain rights, such as dower rights, entitling them to a portion of their deceased husband's estate. However, these rights were often limited and subject to the prevailing patriarchal norms.
Property Rights and Economic Activities
Under English law, the principle of coverture significantly restricted married women's property rights. Any property a woman brought into the marriage or acquired during it became her husband's. This legal framework effectively rendered women economically dependent on their husbands. While widows could inherit property, their control over it was often subject to male relatives or the prevailing legal norms.
Social Conduct and Legal Consequences
The English legal system also imposed stricter moral codes, particularly concerning issues like adultery and fornication. Women found guilty of such offenses could face severe penalties, including public shaming, fines, or corporal punishment. These laws reinforced the social expectation that women were the moral gatekeepers of the family and community.
Conclusion
The 17th century in Delaware was a period of significant legal transformation for women. While Dutch and Swedish colonial laws provided women with certain rights and autonomy, the English legal system introduced more restrictive norms that limited women's legal and economic independence. These changes had a lasting impact on the status and roles of women in Delaware, setting the stage for the evolving legal landscape in the centuries to follow.
Bibliography
