Tuesday, November 25, 2025

Virginia 1610 "Newes from Virginia" by Richard Rich

"Newes from Virginia" was written by an English soldier who sailed with Somers's fleet from England to Virginia in 1609, & participated in the near-abandonment of the Virginia colony in 1610. Rich tells of a baby boy & a baby girl being born there and baptised. He tells of the rich natural fruits & vegetables, hogs, birds, & turtles abounding in Virginia. He celebrates the deliverance of Sir Thomas Gates from the hurricane and the saving of the Virginia colony from near failure.
"Newes from Virginia" By Richard Rich

Nevves from Virginia The lost flocke triumphant. With the happy arriuall of that famous and worthy knight Sr. Thomas Gates: and the well reputed & valiant captaine Mr. Christopher Newporte, and others, into England. With the maner of their distresse in the Iland of Deuils (otherwise called Bermoothawes) where they remayned 42. weekes, & builded two pynaces, in which they returned into Virginia. By R. Rich, Gent. one of the voyage. Printed by Edw: Allde, and are to be solde by Iohn Wright at Christ-Church dore, 1610.

READER,—how to stile thee I knowe not, perhaps learned, perhaps unlearned; happily captious, happily envious; indeed, what or how to tearme thee I knowe not, only as I began I will proceede.

Reader, thou dost peradventure imagine that I am mercenarie in this busines, and write for money (as your moderne Poets use) hired by some of those ever to be admired adventurers to flatter the world. No, I disclaime it. I have knowne the voyage, past the danger, seene that honorable work of Virginia, and I thanke God am arrived here to tell thee what I have seene, done and past. If thou wilt believe me, so; if not, so too; for I cannot force thee but to thy owne liking. I am a soldier, blunt and plaine, and so is the phrase of my newes; and I protest it is true. If thou ask why I put it in verse, I prethee knowe it was only to feede mine owne humour. I must confesse that, had I not debard myselfe of that large scope which to the writing of prose is allowed, I should have much easd myselfe, and given thee better content. But I intreat thee to take this as it is, and before many daies expire, I will promise thee the same worke more at large.

I did feare prevention by some of your writers, if they should have gotten but some part of the newes by the tayle, and therefore, though it be rude, let it passe with thy liking, and in so doing I shall like well of thee; but, how ever, I have not long to stay. If thou wilt be unnatural to thy countryman, thou maist,—I must not loose my patrymonie, I am for Virginia againe, and so I will bid thee hartily farewell with an honest verse,—

As I came hether to see my native land,
To waft me backe lend me thy gentle hand.

Thy loving Country-man, R. R.

Newes From Virginia

of the happy arrivall of that famous and worthy knight Sir Thomas Gates and well reputed and valiante Captaine Newport into England.

IT is no idle fabulous tale, nor is it fayned newes:
For Truth herself is heere arriv’d, because you should not muse.
With her both Gates and Newport come, to tell Report doth lye,
Which did devulge unto the world, that they at sea did dye.

Tis true that eleaven monthes and more, these gallant worthy wights
Was in the shippe Sea-venture nam’d depriv’d Virginia’s sight.
And bravely did they glyde the maine, till Neptune gan to frowne,
As if a courser prowdly backt would throwe his ryder downe.

The seas did rage, the windes did blowe, distressed were they then;
Their ship did leake, her tacklings breake, in daunger were her men.
But heaven was pylotte in this storme, and to an iland nere,
Bermoothawes call’d, conducted then, which did abate their feare.

But yet these worthies forced were, opprest with weather againe,
To runne their ship betweene two rockes, where she doth still remaine.
And then on shoare the iland came, inhabited by hogges,
Some foule and tortoyses there were, they only had one dogge.

To kill these swyne, to yeild them foode that little had to eate,
Their store was spent, and all things scant, alas! they wanted meate.
A thousand hogges that dogge did kill, their hunger to sustaine,
And with such foode did in that ile two and forty weekes remaine.

And there two gallant pynases did build of seader-tree;
The brave Deliverance one was call’d, of seaventy tonne was shee.
The other Patience had to name, her burthen thirty tonne;
Two only of their men which there pale death did overcome.

And for the losse of these two soules, which were accounted deere,
A sonne and daughter then was borne, and were baptized there.
The two and forty weekes being past, they hoyst sayle and away;
Their ships with hogs well freighted were, their harts with mickle joy.

And so unto Virginia came, where these brave soldiers finde
The English-men opprest with greife and discontent in minde.
They seem’d distracted and forlorne, for those two worthyes losse,
Yet at their home returne they joyd, among’st them some were crosse.

And in the mid’st of discontent came noble Delaware;
He heard the greifes on either part, and sett them free from care.
He comforts them and cheeres their hearts, that they abound with joy;
He feedes them full and feedes their soules with Gods word every day.

A discreet counsell he creates of men of worthy fame,
That noble Gates leiftenant was the admirall had to name.
The worthy Sir George Somers knight, and others of commaund;
Maister Georg Pearcy, which is brother unto Northumberland.

Sir Fardinando Wayneman knight, and others of good fame,
That noble lord his company, which to Virginia came,
And landed there; his number was one hundred seaventy; then
Ad to the rest, and they make full foure hundred able men.

Where they unto their labour fall, as men that meane to thrive;
Let’s pray that heaven may blesse them all, and keep them long alive.
Those men that vagrants liv’d with us, have there deserved well;
Their governour writes in their praise, as divers letters tel.

And to th’ adventurers thus he writes be not dismayd at all,
For scandall cannot doe us wrong, God will not let us fall.
Let England knowe our willingnesse, for that our worke is goode;
Wee hope to plant a nation, where none before hath stood.

To glorifie the lord tis done, and to no other end;
He that would crosse so good a worke, to God can be no friend.
There is no feare of hunger here for corne much store here growes,
Much fish the gallant rivers yeild, tis truth without suppose.

Great store of fowle, of venison, of grapes and mulberries,
Of chestnuts, walnuts, and such like, of fruits and strawberries,
There is indeed no want at all, but some, condiciond ill,
That wish the worke should not goe on with words doe seeme to kill.
And for an instance of their store, the noble Delaware
Hath for the present hither sent, to testifie his care
In mannaging so good a worke, to gallant ships, by name
The Blessing and the Hercules, well fraught, and in the same

Two ships, are these commodities, furres, sturgeon, caviare,
Blacke walnut-tree, and some deale boords, with such they laden are;
Some pearle, some wainscot and clapbords, with some sassafras wood,
And iron promist, for tis true their mynes are very good.

Then, maugre scandall, false report, or any opposition,
Th’ adventurers doe thus devulge to men of good condition,
That he that wants shall have reliefe, be he of honest minde,
Apparel, coyne, or any thing, to such they will be kinde.

To such as to Virginia do purpose to repaire;
And when that they shall thither come, each man shall have his share.
Day wages for the laborer, and for his more content,
A house and garden plot shall have; besides, tis further ment

That every man shall have a part, and not thereof denaid,
Of generall profit, as if that he twelve pounds ten shillings paid;
For hyer or commodities, and will the country leave

Upon delivery of such coyne unto the Governour,
Shall by exchange at his returne be by their treasurer
Paid him in London at first sight, no man shall cause to grieve,
For tis their generall will and wish that every man should live.

The number of adventurers, that are for this plantation,
Are full eight hundred worthy men, some noble, all of fashion.
Good, discreete, their worke is good, and as they have begun,
May Heaven assist them in their worke, and thus our newes is done.

Virginia (1607–1776): Women and the Law

 

Virginia (1607–1776): Women and the Law


The Virginia Colony was the first successful British settlement in North America, founded at Jamestown in 1607. Initially governed by the Virginia Company and later by the English Crown, Virginia developed under English common law traditions that were adapted to suit the colony’s specific social, agricultural, and demographic conditions. Women’s roles in this patriarchal society were highly restricted by legal and social norms, but court records reveal real women navigating, resisting, and working within these structures.

**Ann Burras Laydon (c. 1594–unknown)** arrived in Jamestown in 1608 as one of the first Englishwomen in the colony. She came as a maidservant to Mistress Forest and soon married John Laydon, a carpenter. Her marriage was one of the first Christian marriages in Virginia. Ann's early presence helped set social expectations for English women as settlers and helped establish the importance of family life in the colony. She likely performed unpaid domestic work essential to survival, though legal records of her personal actions are scarce.

**Jane Dickenson (dates unknown)** was one of the many women who petitioned the courts in Virginia over property and debt disputes. A 1644 York County court case documents her successfully suing a male debtor. This example shows that women, particularly widows or single women (feme sole), could assert legal claims and be heard in court.

**Temperance Flowerdew Yeardley (1590–1628)** came to Virginia in 1609, survived the "Starving Time," and became a prominent landholder through her marriages to George Yeardley (1587–1627), Governor of Virginia, and later to Governor Francis West. As a wealthy widow, she managed large plantations and enslaved laborers and brought several court suits to defend her property. Her actions show how elite women used legal structures to defend wealth and land rights in a male-dominated society.

**Mary Aggie (dates unknown)** was an enslaved African woman who in 1730 became one of the first enslaved people to successfully petition for "benefit of clergy" in a Virginia court. Charged with theft, she argued that as a Christian she should be given leniency, as the law extended to baptized Christians. Her case helped clarify how religious conversion and race intersected in colonial legal structures, and it also reflects how enslaved women engaged with the legal system despite their status.

**Eliza Lucas Pinckney (1722–1793)**, though more strongly associated with South Carolina, corresponded with Virginia elites and offers a comparative lens. Her letters provide insights into the education and agency of elite women in the South and help us interpret similar Virginian women’s roles in estate management and agricultural enterprise.

**Cecily Jordan Farrar (c. 1600–after 1625)** was one of the first women in Virginia to petition for a legal marriage contract dispute. After the death of her husband Samuel Jordan, she quickly became involved in a contested courtship and legal case with Reverend Greville Pooley, who claimed she had promised to marry him. Cecily successfully defended her rights and ultimately married William Farrar. Her case is one of the earliest surviving examples of a woman defending her autonomy in the colonial Virginia legal system.

Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, colonial laws in Virginia continued to deny most women political rights. Married women were subject to coverture and were expected to defer to their husbands in all legal and property matters. However, single women and widows (feme sole) retained some rights and regularly appeared in court as litigants, witnesses, and even occasional executors of estates. Women's interactions with the law, especially around inheritance, slander, assault, and indenture, reveal their legal vulnerability but also their persistence.

Court records from the General Court, county courts, and vestry books provide dozens of additional examples of real women shaping colonial Virginia’s legal culture—not always successfully, but often memorably. These stories reveal that colonial law was not abstract. It was lived, negotiated, and resisted by women with names, families, work, fears, and hopes.


1607 -1699 Virginia Women, Religion, & Society

 
The First Expedition lands in Virginia. Image Source: The Story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith, E. Boyd Smith, 1906.  The Virginia Company of London, landing here, was a Joint-Stock Company that founded Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in the New World. The Virginia Company created the House of Burgesses, the first representative government in America. The Company set up the Headright System to encourage immigration to Virginia. The Virginia Company was dissolved in 1624 by King Charles I, and Virginia became a Royal Colony.

1607 -1699  Women. Religion, & Society in the Virginia Colony 

Introduction

An Analysis of Religious Influence, Settler Origins, and Women's Roles

When English settlers founded Jamestown in 1607, they established the first permanent English settlement in the Americas. Initially driven by the pursuit of profit through tobacco cultivation, the Virginia Colony also experienced the shaping force of religion on its social structure and governance. Between 1607 and 1699, the Anglican Church became the dominant religious force, significantly influencing the roles and expectations of settlers, especially women. This essay examines the dominant religion in the Virginia Colony during this period, the origins of its settlers, the expectations that the religious framework placed on women, and the roles women held in governance.

Dominant Religion in Virginia (1607-1699)

From 1607 to 1699, the Church of England, or Anglicanism, dominated the religious landscape of the Virginia Colony. After the English Reformation, the settlers brought Anglicanism with them as the established state religion. The colonial government reinforced Anglican dominance by mandating church attendance and requiring public officials to swear allegiance to the Church of England. Local vestries and parish councils played crucial roles in community governance, reflecting the hierarchical structure of the church. In 1642, Governor Sir William Berkeley enacted laws that solidified the Church of England’s authority, making it the legally established church and requiring all inhabitants to conform to its practices.

Origins of the Settlers

Between 1607 and 1699, most settlers in Virginia came from England. Drawn by opportunities for economic advancement, land ownership, and a new life in the New World, they included gentlemen, laborers, artisans, and indentured servants. The promise of land ownership and the booming tobacco economy attracted many to Virginia. Over time, African slaves were forcibly brought to work on the tobacco plantations, and smaller groups of European immigrants from Scotland, Ireland, and Germany also arrived. However, the English remained the dominant cultural and social group throughout this period.

Religious Expectations of Women (1607-1699)

The Anglican Church’s religious framework profoundly shaped the expectations placed on women in the Virginia Colony. Religious and social structures reinforced patriarchal norms, emphasizing that women should be submissive to their husbands, modest in behavior, and dedicated to the domestic sphere. Anglican doctrine emphasized a woman’s role as a wife and mother, responsible for maintaining the household, raising children, and supporting her husband’s endeavors. The legal doctrine of coverture, derived from English common law, subsumed a woman’s identity under her husband’s upon marriage, reflecting her subordinate position within the household and society.

Women actively participated in the religious life of the community by attending church services regularly and engaging in parish activities. However, their roles were limited to those that aligned with their perceived moral and nurturing nature, such as charitable work, teaching children, and assisting the sick. The religious culture in Virginia did not encourage women to seek roles outside the home or in public life.

Women's Roles in Governance (1607-1699)

Between 1607 and 1699, women in the Virginia Colony had no formal role in governance. The colony’s government mirrored English structures, concentrating political power in the hands of men. The House of Burgesses, established in 1619 as the first representative assembly in the Americas, consisted entirely of male landowners. Only free men, particularly those who owned property, could vote or hold political office. Women, regardless of their social status, were excluded from voting, holding office, or participating in legislative decision-making.

The patriarchal structure extended to religious institutions, where men dominated leadership roles within the Church of England. Vestries, which governed local parishes and influenced community affairs, were composed solely of men. Although women could exert some influence indirectly through their relationships with male relatives or as members of prominent families, their lack of formal power meant that their voices were largely marginalized in public and political life.

Conclusion

Between 1607 and 1699, the Virginia Colony was shaped by the dominant influence of the Anglican Church, the majority of English settlers, and a patriarchal social structure that enforced strict gender roles. The Church of England’s religious doctrine reinforced the expectation that women remain submissive, focus on domestic duties, and avoid public life. As a result, women held no formal role in the colony’s governance, with political and religious power firmly in the hands of men. The intersection of religion, gender, and governance in early Virginia reveals the deeply entrenched patriarchal norms that shaped the colony’s development and the lives of its inhabitants..

Bibliography

Books:

Breen, T. H. Tobacco Culture: The Mentality of the Great Tidewater Planters on the Eve of Revolution. Princeton University Press, 2001.

Butler, Jon. Awash in a Sea of Faith: Christianizing the American People. Harvard University Press, 1990.

Gundersen, Joan R. To Be Useful to the World: Women in Revolutionary America, 1740-1790. University of North Carolina Press, 2006.

Isaac, Rhys. The Transformation of Virginia, 1740-1790. University of North Carolina Press, 1999.

Morgan, Edmund S. American Slavery, American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia. W. W. Norton & Company, 1975.

Norton, Mary Beth. Founding Mothers & Fathers: Gendered Power and the Forming of American Society. Knopf, 1996.

Articles:

Brown, Kathleen M. "Gender and the Genesis of a Race and Class System in Virginia, 1630-1750." The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 2, 1997, pp. 239-268.

Heyrman, Christine Leigh. "The Episcopal Church and Women in the Southern Colonies." Journal of Religious History, vol. 24, no. 3, 2000, pp. 217-235.

Horn, James. "Adapting to a New World: English Society in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake." Colonial Williamsburg Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, 2000, pp. 32-55.

Rutman, Darrett B., and Anita H. Rutman. "Women's Roles in the Southern Colonies." Journal of Southern History, vol. 50, no. 4, 1984, pp. 681-710.

Salinger, Sharon V. "To Serve Well and Faithfully: Labor and Indentured Servants in Pennsylvania and Virginia, 1682-1782." Labor History, vol. 32, no. 1, 1991, pp. 40-56.

Salmon, Marylynn. "The Legal Status of Women in Early America: A Reappraisal." Law and History Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 1983, pp. 129-151.

Walsh, Lorena S. "Servitude and Opportunity in Colonial Virginia." Agricultural History, vol. 52, no. 2, 1978, pp. 335-350.

Zacek, Natalie. "Voices and Silences: The Laboring Poor and the Anglican Church in Virginia, 1680-1776." Historical Journal, vol. 40, no. 3, 1997, pp. 639-667.

Food in Early 1590s Virginia by Thomas Hariot (1560–1621)

Portrait often claimed to be Thomas Harriot (1602), which hangs in Trinity College, Oxford. The provenance of this portrait is not known, and there is scant evidence to link it to Harriot

 Thomas Hariot's A Brief and True Report

(The following text is a modernization of the English language used from the original source, printed in 1590.)

A briefe and true report of the new found land of Virginia

of the commodities and of the nature and manners of the natural inhabitants. 

CONCERNING SUCH COMMODITIES AS VIRGINIA

IS KNOWN TO YIELD FOR FOOD AND THE SUSTENANCE

OF LIFE, CUSTOMARILY EATEN BY THE NATIVES

AND USED BY US WHILE WE WERE THERE

FIRST, CONCERNING SUCH AS ARE SOWN AND FARMED.

Pagatowr is a kind of grain. It is called maize in the West Indies; Englishmen name it Guinea wheat or Turkey wheat, after the countries from which a similar grain has been brought. This grain is about the size of our ordinary English peas and, while similar to them in form and shape, differs in color, some grains being white, some red, some yellow, and some blue. All of them yield a very white and sweet flour which makes excellent bread. We made malt from the grain while we were in Virginia and brewed as good an ale of it as could be desired. It also could be used, with the addition of hops, to produce a good beer. The grain increases on a marvelous scale-a thousand times, fifteen hundred, and in some cases two thousand fold. There are three sorts, of which two are ripe in ten, eleven, and, at the most, twelve weeks, when their stalks are about six or seven feet in height. The third one ripens in fourteen weeks and is ten feet high. Its stalks bear one, two, three, or four heads, and every head contains five, six, or seven hundred grains, as near as I can say. The inhabitants not only use it for bread but also make food of these grains. They either parch them, boiling them whole until they break, or boil the flour with water into a pap.

Okindgier we called beans, because they are like the beans in England, except that they are flatter, more varied in color, and some are pied. The leaf on the stem is also different. However, they taste as good as our English peas.

Wickonzowr. We named these peas to distinguish them from the beans, because they are much smaller. They differ little from the beans, though they taste different and are far better than our English peas.

Both the beans and the peas ripen in ten weeks. The natives boil them in a broth, where the beans are reduced to small pieces or boil them whole until they are soft and begin to break, as we prepare them in England. These peas are either cooked by themselves or mixed with wheat. Sometimes after they have been boiled whole they are pounded in a mortar and made into loaves or lumps of doughy bread.

Macocqwer. This is the native name for what we call pumpkins, melons, and gourds. In Virginia there are several varieties of this family, all of which taste very good. There are two varieties of macocqwer, one of which is ripe in a month, the other in two months.

There is an herb which is called melden in Dutch. Some people to whom I have described it believe that it is a kind of orach [mountain spinach]. It grows about four or five feet high, and the natives make a thick fine-tasting broth of its seeds. From the stalk of the herb they produce a kind of salt by burning it to ashes. This is the only salt they know, and they season their broths with it. We ourselves have used the leaves for pot-herbs.

There is also another large herb, which resembles the marigold, about six feet high. The head is a span in width with the flower. Some believe it to be planta solis [sunflower] From its seeds a kind of bread and also a broth are made.

All the commodities I have described are planted, sometimes separately, but more often mixed together in one plot. To make you understand the fertility of the soil, I will explain briefly how the natives prepare the ground and how they go about the planting.

They never enrich the soil with refuse, dung, or any other thing, nor do they plough or dig it as we do in England. They simply break the upper part of the ground to raise up the weeds, grass, and old stubs of cornstalks with their roots. This is done by the men a few days before they sow, using wooden instruments made almost like mattocks or hoes with long handles, while the women sit on the ground helping with short peckers or parers about a foot long and five inches in breadth. After the weeds have dried in the sun for a day or two, the refuse is scraped up into many small heaps and burned to ashes. This they do to save themselves the labor of carrying it away, rather than to enrich and better the ground.

Then they sow the seed. For corn they begin in one corner of the plot and make a hole with a pecker. They put four grains into each hole, about an inch apart, taking care that they do not touch one another, and cover them with soil. The seeds are planted in rows, each row spaced half a fathom or a yard from the last, and the holes in each row are the same distance apart. Thus, there is a yard of spare ground between the holes, where the natives sometimes set beans and peas or plant macocqwer, melden, and sunflowers.

The planted ground, compared with an English acre of forty rods in length and four in breadth, yields at least two hundred London bushels of corn, beans, and peas, in addition to the crop of macocqtver, melden, and sunflowers. In England we think it a large crop if an acre gives forty bushels of wheat.

So that you who will live and plant there may know how much that country's corn is to be preferred to ours, I thought it good to tell you this. Besides the many ways it may be used for food, the yield is so great that little labor is needed in comparison with what is necessary in England. Of this I can assure you, for according to our experiments we found that one man may prepare and cultivate as much ground (which has borne corn before) with less than twenty-four hours' labor as will supply him food in abundance for a year. This is true even though he has no other food save what was grown in that ground, and of no other kinds than those I have spoken of, and even if the plot were only twenty-five yards square. If it were necessary, two crops could be raised on the same plot. For the natives sow at any time from the middle of March until the end of June and can still plant after they have eaten from their first harvest. We have heard that in some places they do harvest two crops from the same ground.

As to English corn, whether you who will live there should wish to use it or not, you may decide as you think best after trial. You need not doubt that it will grow, for we have seen the proof with barley, oats, and peas. We did not purposely plant these; the seeds fell casually in the worst sort of ground, and yet they grew to be as fair as any we have ever seen in England. We could not try our wheat, because it was musty and had soaked up salt water, nor could we test our rye.

There is an herb called uppowoc, which sows itself. In the West Indies it has several names, according to the different places where it grows and is used, but the Spaniards generally call it tobacco. Its leaves are dried, made into powder, and then smoked by being sucked through clay pipes into the stomach and head. The fumes purge superfluous phlegm and gross humor2 from the body by opening all the pores and passages. Thus its use not only preserves the body, but if there are any obstructions it breaks them up. By this means the natives keep in excellent health, without many of the grievous diseases which often afflict us in England.

This uppowoc is so highly valued by them that they think their gods are delighted with it. Sometimes they make holy fires and cast the powder into them as a sacrifice. if there is a storm on the waters, they throw it up into the air and into the water to pacify their gods. Also, when they set up a new weir for fish, they pour uppowoc into it. And if they escape from danger, they also throw the powder up into the air. This is always done with strange gestures and stamping, sometimes dancing, clapping of hands, holding hands up, and staring up into the heavens. During this performance they chatter strange words and utter meaningless noises.

While we were there we used to suck in the smoke as they did, and now that we are back in England we still do so. We have found many rare and wonderful proofs of the uppowoc's virtues, which would themselves require a volume to relate. There is sufficient evidence in the fact that it is used by so many men and women of great calling, as well as by some learned physicians.

CONCERNING ROOTS

Openauk is a kind of round-shaped root the size of walnuts or larger. It is found in moist or marsh grounds growing together in ropes, as though fastened with string. When boiled it makes a very good food.

Okeepenauk is also round in shape, but is found in dry places. Some of these roots are as large as a man's head. They have to be eaten as soon as they are taken out of the ground, because they are dry and will neither boil nor roast. They do not taste as good as the first-named kind, but even so the inhabitants eat them with fish or meat, especially when they do not have bread or wish to vary their food. In my judgment it is as good as the English household bread made of rye.

Kaishucpenauk is a white root about the size and shape of a hen's egg. It does not taste as good as the other; therefore we did not pay much attention to the manner of its growth. Still, the inhabitants often boil and eat it.

Tsinaw is much like the root called China root here in England, which is brought from the East Indies. And for all we know, it may even be the same. The roots grow in large clusters, the stalk is like that of a briar, but the leaf has a very different shape. It grows near trees, and sometimes climbs to the top of the highest. The fresh-dug roots are chopped into small pieces and pounded, and the juice formed by the adding of water is strained and used to make bread. When the root is boiled it gives a very good spoon-meat [pudding] like a jelly and is even better if the taste is tempered with oil. This tsinaw cannot be the same as China root, for it has been discovered since China root was brought into England; the roots are, however, very similar in shape.

Coscushaw. Some of our men believed this to be the same root Which the Spaniards of the West Indies call cassavy; we therefore gave it the same name. It grows in muddy pools and moist ground. Prepared in the native fashion, cassavy makes not only a good bread but also a good spoon-meat. The juice of this root is poison, and for this reason care must be taken before anything is made with it. Either the roots must first be sliced and dried in the sun or by a fire and pounded into flour, or else they must be peeled while they are green, cut into pieces, and then beaten. The loaves made from the our must) e ai' near or over the fire until they are sour. After this they are well pounded again, and the bread or spoon-meat made from them has a very good taste.

Habascon is a root like a parsnip in size and shape and hot in taste. It is not used by itself, but is boiled to flavor other foods.

There are also leeks in many parts of the country, differing very little from ours. We gathered and ate them, but the native inhabitants never did.

CONCERNING FRUITS

Chestnuts grow in great abundance in several places. The natives eat them raw, or crushed and boiled; they also make the same kind of dough bread from the boiled chestnuts that they do from the beans.

Walnuts are of two kinds, and there is an infinite number of both. In some of their great forests a third of the trees are walnut. The one kind is very similar in taste and form to the English walnut, only harder and thicker shelled. But the other kind is larger, with a hard and ragged shell. The kernels of the fruit are very oily and sweet. The inhabitants either eat them or make a milk of them by breaking the nuts with stones and grinding the powder in a mortar with water. This they add to their spoon-meat, their boiled wheat, peas, beans, and pumpkins, thus giving the food a far more pleasant taste.

Medlars are an excellent fruit, which are not tasty until they are rotten-ripe, They are about the size of our medlars and open at the head as ours do, but otherwise they differ both in taste and color. Their color is as red as cherries, and their taste is sweet, but while the cherry's sweetness is sharp, medlars are luscious.

Metaquesunnauk. This is a pleasant fruit, almost the same shape and size as our English pear. Its color is a perfect red, both inside and out. The plant that bears it has thick leaves full of prickles, sharp as needles. Men who have visited the Indies and seen there the kind of red dye called cochineal relate that its plant is very like that of metaquesunnauk. Whether they speak of the true cochineal or of a wild variety I cannot say, as I think that true cochineal does not come from the fruit, but is found on the leaves of the plant.

Grapes. I have mentioned two kinds of grapes under the marketable commodities.

Strawberries found in Virginia are as good and as large as those we have in our English gardens.

Mulberries, crab-apples, and whortleberries are the same as those we have in England.

Sacquenummener. These berries look like capers, but are somewhat larger. They grow in clusters on a plant or herb found in shallow waters. If boiled eight or nine hours they give good, wholesome food, but if they are eaten raw they will make a man frantic and extremely sick for a time.

There is also a variety of reed which bears a seed much like our rye or wheat and when boiled, makes a good food.

In our travels we found in some places wild peas very much like our English peas, except that they were smaller.

CONCERNING A KIND OF FRUIT OR BERRY

LIKE THE ACORN

There are five different sorts of berries or acorns growing on trees, The kinds called sagatemener, osamener, and pummuckoner are dried upon a fire on a hurdle made of reeds, very much as we dry malt in England. When the berries are ready, the natives water them until they are soft, then boil them. They are eaten either raw or pounded into loaves or lumps of bread. The berries are also used for-making sweet oil.

Another kind is the sapummener, which, boiled or parched, tastes like chestnuts and is eaten in much the same way.

The fifth kind is called mangummenauk. The acorns are dried like the other berries and then soaked and boiled. Not only the ordinary natives but also the chiefs themselves eat them with fish or flesh, instead of bread.

CONCERNING BEASTS

Deer. In some places there are a great number of deer. Near the seacoast their size is that of our ordinary English deer, though sometimes they are smaller; but farther inland, where there is better feed, they are larger. They differ from our deer in two ways: their tails are longer, and the snags of their horns point backward.

Conies, or rabbits, are gray in color like hares. In some places there are so many that the people of the towns make mantles for themselves of the fur or down from the skins.

Saquenuckot and maquowoc, two small animals somewhat larger than rabbits, make good meat. We have not caught any of them, but ate many which the natives brought to us.

Squirrels. We caught and ate gray squirrels.

Bears are black in color. In the winter the natives shoot and eat a great many, just as we did. They are hunted in certain islands or in places where they are especially abundant. When the bears perceive a man, they run away, and when they are chased, they climb the nearest tree, from which the natives shoot them down. We too have hunted them and killed them with our muskets.

I have the names of twenty-eight different kinds of beasts which I have been told are found in various parts of the country. Of these we have so far discovered only twelve, and those which are good for food I have already mentioned. At times the natives kill a lion and eat it, and we ourselves have eaten their wolves or wolfdogs. These I have not set down as good meat, lest my judgment in the matter be thought more simple than it is. I could describe, though, how different is the taste of the Virginia wolves from that of our English ones, for some of our company have eaten both.

CONCERNING FOWL

Turkey cocks and turkey hens, stockdoves, partridges, cranes, and herons. Swans and geese, which could be had in winter in great abundance, may be added to these. I have noted in the native language the names of eighty-six different kinds of fowl. Besides those I have already named, we have caught and eaten, as well as made pictures of, several different varieties of waterfowl and seventeen kinds of land fowl. We have seen and eaten many others as well, but had not the leisure to draw pictures of them. When we make further discoveries and have better examples, I shall publish all we know about the strange beasts, fish, trees, plants, and herbs there.

We found also parrots, falcons, and merlins, which we do not use for food, but I thought it would be well to mention them for other reasons.

CONCERNING FISH

For four months of the year-February, March, April, and May-there are plenty of sturgeon and herring. Some of these fish are the size of those we find commonly in England, but most of them are far larger-eighteen, twenty inches, and some two feet in length and more. We found them to be a most delicate and pleasant food.

There are also trout, porpoises, rays, oldwives, mullets, plaice, and many other varieties of excellent fish which we caught and ate. I know their names only in the language of the country. But we made pictures of twelve different kinds of fish while we were there.

The natives catch fish in two different ways: one is by trapping them in a kind of weir made of very strong reeds; the other is by using a pole sharpened at one end, and spearing the fish in much the same way as Irishmen cast darts. This they do either while wading in the shallows or while rowing in their boats.

There are also plenty of shellfish, sea crabs such as we have in England, and large and small oysters. They are found both in salt and brackish water, and, as in our own country, those taken from salt water are the best. Besides these, there are mussels, scallops, periwinkles, and crayfish. Seekanauk, a kind of crusty shellfish, is a good food. It is about a foot wide, has a crusty tail, many legs, like a crab, and its eyes are set in its back. It can be found in salt-water shallows or on the shore.

Tortoises, both of the land and sea varieties, are more than a yard in breadth, with thick shells on their backs and bellies. Their heads, feet, and tails look very ugly, like those of a venomous serpent. Nevertheless, they are very good to eat, as are their eggs.

Thus, I have told about all the kinds of food eaten in Virginia that I can remember and that are worthy of mention.




 Virginia:

Powhatan Confederacy

  • Pamunkey: Lived in the coastal regions of Virginia, particularly around the Pamunkey and Mattaponi rivers. They were skilled farmers and traders.
  • Mattaponi: Also lived in the coastal regions, near the Mattaponi River. They were known for their expertise in fishing and boat-building.
  • Chickahominy: Inhabited the coastal regions, particularly around the Chickahominy River. They were skilled hunters and gatherers.
  • Nansemond: Lived in the southeastern part of Virginia, near the Nansemond River. They were known for their expertise in fishing and trade.
  • Weyanoke: Inhabited the coastal regions, particularly around the Weyanoke River. They were skilled farmers and traders.

Algonquian-speaking tribes outside the Powhatan Confederacy

  • Piscataway: Lived in the northern part of Virginia, near the Potomac River. They were skilled hunters and gatherers.
  • Nacotchtank: Inhabited the northern part of Virginia, near the Anacostia River. They were known for their expertise in fishing and trade.
  • Accomac: Lived on the Eastern Shore of Virginia, particularly around the Accomac River. They were skilled farmers and traders.

Iroquoian-speaking tribes

  • Manahoac: Inhabited the northern part of Virginia, near the Manahoac River. They were skilled hunters and gatherers.
  • Monacan: Lived in the western part of Virginia, near the James River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.
  • Saponi: Inhabited the western part of Virginia, near the Saponi River. They were skilled hunters and gatherers.
  • Occaneechi: Lived in the western part of Virginia, near the Occaneechi River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.

Siouan-speaking tribes

  • Moneton: Inhabited the western part of Virginia, near the Moneton River. They were skilled hunters and gatherers.
  • Saponi: Also spoke a Siouan language, in addition to their Iroquoian dialect. They lived in the western part of Virginia.
  • Tutelo: Lived in the western part of Virginia, near the Tutelo River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.
These tribes had distinct cultures, languages, and traditions, and interacted with English colonizers in various ways, including trade, conflict, and alliance.

1600 Virginia Food Grown by Native Tribes

 1600s, Virginia was inhabited by several Native American tribes, including:

Algonquian-speaking tribes

  • Powhatan Confederacy: A powerful alliance of tribes that lived in the eastern part of Virginia, particularly around the Chesapeake Bay. They were skilled farmers, hunters, and traders.
  • Pamunkey: Lived in the eastern part of Virginia, particularly around the Pamunkey River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.
  • Mattaponi: Inhabited the eastern part of Virginia, particularly around the Mattaponi River. They were skilled farmers, hunters, and traders.
  • Chickahominy: Lived in the eastern part of Virginia, particularly around the Chickahominy River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.

Iroquoian-speaking tribes

  • Manahoac: Lived in the northern part of Virginia, particularly around the Manahoac River. They were skilled farmers, hunters, and traders.
  • Monacan: Inhabited the western part of Virginia, particularly around the Monacan River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.

Siouan-speaking tribes

  • Moneton: Lived in the western part of Virginia, particularly around the Moneton River. They were skilled farmers, hunters, and traders.
  • Saponi: Inhabited the western part of Virginia, particularly around the Saponi River. They were known for their expertise in farming and trade.

Other Tribes

  • Tuscarora: Although primarily located in North Carolina, the Tuscarora Nation had settlements in southern Virginia.
These tribes had distinct cultures, languages, and traditions, and interacted with European colonizers in various ways, including trade, conflict, and alliance.



Books
Brecourt-Villars, Claudine. The Elegant Table: Dining and Dining Rooms, 1700-1850. 1990.
Hess, Karen. Martha Washington's Booke of Cookery. 1995.
McIntyre, Sylvia. Cooking in Colonial Virginia. 2004.
Articles
Brown, Kathi Ann. "Foodways in Colonial Virginia." The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 115, No. 3, 2007.
Hess, Karen. "The Virginian Housewife: A Study of the Domestic Economy of the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake." The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1977.
Taylor, Lonn. "Food and Drink in Colonial Virginia." The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1987.
Dissertations and Theses
Brown, Kathi Ann. Foodways in Colonial Virginia, 1607-1776. Ph.D. dissertation, College of William and Mary, 2005.
Hess, Karen. The Domestic Economy of the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1975.
Primary Sources
Randolph, Mary. The Virginia Housewife. 1824.
Smith, Eliza. The Compleat Housewife. 1727.
Washington, Martha. Martha Washington's Booke of Cookery. Edited by Karen Hess, 1995.